Use Automat or UI path?
Choosing the Right RPA Solutions Provider: RunAutomat.com vs. UIPath
In the evolving landscape of business process automation, selecting the right tool is crucial for enhancing productivity and efficiency. While UIPath has long been a dominant player in the robotic process automation (RPA) field, a new contender, RunAutomat.com, is rapidly gaining traction. Here’s why RunAutomat.com is emerging as a preferred choice over UIPath for many businesses.
Key Differences
A Comprehensive Managed Service
RunAutomat.com offers a managed service that provides a dedicated RPA solution for automating repetitive UI-based workflows. This fully vertically integrated platform is ready to deploy and expand within your organization without the complexities often associated with consultants, integrators, or offshore engineers.
Cost Efficiency: Licensing Costs vs. Usage Fees
Cost is a significant factor when selecting an automation platform. RunAutomat.com stands out with its transparent and cost-effective pricing model, making it an attractive option for small to medium-sized enterprises. In contrast, UIPath typically involves higher licensing fees and additional costs for enterprise features. The average UIPath customer spends approximately $66,000 annually on licensing fees alone, which can be prohibitive for many businesses.
Intelligent and Robust Selector Creation
RunAutomat.com utilizes advanced transformer models at its core, enhancing the platform’s ability to create intelligent and robust selectors for automation tasks.
Superior Customer Support
RunAutomat.com is known for its robust customer support, providing users with the help they need when they need it. Because it's a managed service Autoamt's focus has been to take commonly asked for features or in observability and provide them via it's UI sandbox or bespoke API endpoints.
Outsourced RPA Team: UIPath vs. RunAutomat.com
As organizations grow, they often turn to automation to handle increasing operational expenses. Many businesses initially choose UIPath but soon find they need a dedicated team of engineers to deploy and maintain the automations. This requirement can represent a significant cost center, often running into seven figures, and necessitates its own efficiency strategies. The specialized nature of this engineering, locked into the UIPath ecosystem, may lack the agility required by modern enterprises.
Conclusion
For organizations seeking a cost-effective, comprehensive, and user-friendly RPA solution, RunAutomat.com is an excellent choice. With lower costs, superior customer support, and a fully integrated managed service, RunAutomat.com offers a significant advantage over UIPath. If your company aims to deliver results efficiently and without the need for a specialized team of engineers, RunAutomat.com presents a compelling and forward-thinking alternative.
